What are best practices for plan review in building departments?

Thorough documentation and consistency in criteria application are essential best practices for plan review in building departments because they ensure clarity and transparency in the review process. Having well-documented criteria allows all stakeholders, including architects, builders, and the reviewing officials, to understand and follow the established guidelines. This practice fosters an environment of fairness and accountability, as consistent application of these criteria leads to predictable outcomes.

Moreover, thorough documentation not only supports the decision-making process but also provides a valuable reference for future reviews, helping to streamline what can be an intricate and complex process. It reduces the likelihood of errors and misunderstandings, which can lead to delays and additional costs for applicants. Consistency in applying the review criteria ensures that similar projects are subjected to the same standards, which upholds the integrity of the building code and ensures public safety, thus reinforcing the role of the building department as an effective regulatory body.

By contrast, while utilizing advanced technology can enhance efficiency, it does not substitute for the foundational practices of documentation and consistency. Speeding up the review process might compromise the thoroughness required, and performing reviews only when necessary could result in critical oversights, endangering compliance with safety standards. Therefore, emphasizing thorough documentation and consistent criteria application aligns with the best